Skip navigation

U.S. v. Smith, No. 03-13639 (11th Cir.) (459 F.3d 1276) (August 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)

Previously, in U.S. v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2005) (“Smith I”) (P&J, 03/14/05), the Eleventh Circuit held that the defendant’s purely intrastate, non-commercial production and possession of child pornography was not subject to Commerce Clause regulation. Accordingly, the Court reversed the defendant’s convictions for child pornography …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login