U.S. v. Smith, No. 03-13639 (11th Cir.) (459 F.3d 1276) (August 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
Previously, in U.S. v. Smith, 402 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2005) (“Smith I”) (P&J, 03/14/05), the Eleventh Circuit held that the defendant’s purely intrastate, non-commercial production and possession of child pornography was not subject to Commerce Clause regulation. Accordingly, the Court reversed the defendant’s convictions for child pornography ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login