Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the ATF, No. 03-5582 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 433) (July 3, 2006) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
Loaded on June 1, 2006
published in Punch and Jurists
June 12, 2006
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Particularity Requirement.
The Fourth Amendment provides in part that "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." In this case, several agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Vonner, No. 05-5295 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 560) (June 29, 2006) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. MacEwan, No. 05-1421 (3rd Cir.) (445 F.3d 237) (April 5, 2006) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
- U.S. v. Menyweather, No. 03-50496 (9th Cir.) (447 F.3d 625) (May 9, 2006) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Reeks, No. CR-04-82-B-W (D.Me.) (441 F.Supp.2d 123) (July 7, 2006) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
- U.S. v. Crisp, No. 05-12304 (11th Cir.) (454 F.3d 1285) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Estupinan, No. 05-16279 (11th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1336) (June 28, 2006) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 05 Crim. 0888 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (435 F.Supp.2d 330) (June 26, 2006) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 03-13226 (11th Cir.) (446 F.3d 1210) (April 20, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Powell, No. 05-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (451 F.3d 862) (June 23, 2006) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Levine v. Apker, No. 05-2590-pr (2nd Cir.) (455 F.3d 71) (July 10, 2006) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Meyer, No. 06-1283 (8th Cir.) (452 F.3d 998) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 05-1348 (3rd Cir.) (451 F.3d 154) (June 15, 2006) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 05-16645 (11th Cir.) (455 F.3d 1227) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the ATF, No. 03-5582 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 433) (July 3, 2006) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, No. 05-184 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 557; 126 S.Ct. 2749) (June 29, 2006) (Justice Stevens)
More from these topics:
- Delaware Supreme Court: Warrant That Authorized Search of ‘Any and All’ Data of Named Files on Cellphone Is Invalid General Warrant That Also Failed to Include Temporal Limitation, June 15, 2024. Search warrants, Warrants, Particularity Requirement, Overbreadth, Warrants - General Search, Digital Devices.
- Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Mansor Ruling for Search Warrants for Digital Data and Announces Framework for Suppression When Warrant Contains Both Constitutional and Unconstitutional Search Categories, Oct. 1, 2023. Particularity Requirement, Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Tenth Circuit: Warrant Authorizing Search for Items ‘Involved in Crime’ Violates Fourth Amendment’s Particularity Requirement, Not Saved by Doctrine of Severability, Sept. 15, 2021. Particularity Requirement, Fourth Amendment.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.