Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Adams, No. 04-5391-cr (2nd Cir.) (448 F.3d 492) (May 10, 2006) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)

Loaded on June 1, 2006 published in Punch and Jurists June 26, 2006
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Drugs - Type or Quality of.

This opinion does not break new ground, but is a good reminder that while the substantive distribution offense under the drug laws, e.g., 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), does not (as the law currently stands) require proof that the defendant knew the type and quantity of drugs he was selling or …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Hepting v. AT&T Corporation, No. C-06-672 VRW (N.D.Cal.) (439 F.Supp.2d 974) (July 20, 2006) (Judge Vaughn R. Walker)
  2. U.S. v. Lyons, No. 04-50082 (9th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1222) (July 17, 2006) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  3. U.S. v. Spilmon, No. 05-3750 (7th Cir.) (454 F.3d 657) (July 19, 2006) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  4. U.S. v. Adelson, No. 05 Cr. 325 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (441 F.Supp.2d 506) (July 20, 2006) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  5. U.S. v. Adams, No. 04-5391-cr (2nd Cir.) (448 F.3d 492) (May 10, 2006) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
  6. Terkel v. AT&T Corporation, No. 06 C 2837 (N.D.Ill.) (441 F.Supp.2d 899) (July 25, 2006) (Judge Matthew F. Kennelly)
  7. Doe v. Pataki, No. 96 Civ. 1657(DC) (S.D.N.Y.) (427 F.Supp.2d 398) (April 12, 2006) (Judge Denny Chin)

More from these topics: