Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Lyons, No. 04-50082 (9th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1222) (July 17, 2006) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

Loaded on June 1, 2006 published in Punch and Jurists June 26, 2006
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Telemarketing Fraud.

This consolidated appeal is an interesting telemarketing fraud case that explores the Supreme Court’s recent default rule that, in a criminal prosecutions for fraud involving telemarketing, the "bare failure to disclose [the high cost of fundraising] directly to potential donors does not suffice to establish fraud." The decision starts with ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Doe v. Pataki, No. 96 Civ. 1657(DC) (S.D.N.Y.) (427 F.Supp.2d 398) (April 12, 2006) (Judge Denny Chin)
  2. Terkel v. AT&T Corporation, No. 06 C 2837 (N.D.Ill.) (441 F.Supp.2d 899) (July 25, 2006) (Judge Matthew F. Kennelly)
  3. U.S. v. Adams, No. 04-5391-cr (2nd Cir.) (448 F.3d 492) (May 10, 2006) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
  4. U.S. v. Adelson, No. 05 Cr. 325 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (441 F.Supp.2d 506) (July 20, 2006) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  5. U.S. v. Spilmon, No. 05-3750 (7th Cir.) (454 F.3d 657) (July 19, 2006) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  6. U.S. v. Lyons, No. 04-50082 (9th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1222) (July 17, 2006) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  7. Hepting v. AT&T Corporation, No. C-06-672 VRW (N.D.Cal.) (439 F.Supp.2d 974) (July 20, 2006) (Judge Vaughn R. Walker)

More from these topics: