U.S. v. MacEwan, No. 05-1421 (3rd Cir.) (445 F.3d 237) (April 5, 2006) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
Loaded on June 1, 2006
published in Punch and Jurists
June 12, 2006
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Mandatory Minimums.
James MacEwan is a 71-year-old repeat offender of the federal laws prohibiting the distribution and receipt of child pornography. As a condition of his probation in a previous case, he was required to consent to random searches of his computer. During three such searches, the probation officer discovered more …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Vonner, No. 05-5295 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 560) (June 29, 2006) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the ATF, No. 03-5582 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 433) (July 3, 2006) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 05-16645 (11th Cir.) (455 F.3d 1227) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 05-1348 (3rd Cir.) (451 F.3d 154) (June 15, 2006) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Meyer, No. 06-1283 (8th Cir.) (452 F.3d 998) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- Levine v. Apker, No. 05-2590-pr (2nd Cir.) (455 F.3d 71) (July 10, 2006) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Powell, No. 05-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (451 F.3d 862) (June 23, 2006) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 03-13226 (11th Cir.) (446 F.3d 1210) (April 20, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 05 Crim. 0888 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (435 F.Supp.2d 330) (June 26, 2006) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Estupinan, No. 05-16279 (11th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1336) (June 28, 2006) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Crisp, No. 05-12304 (11th Cir.) (454 F.3d 1285) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Reeks, No. CR-04-82-B-W (D.Me.) (441 F.Supp.2d 123) (July 7, 2006) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
- U.S. v. Menyweather, No. 03-50496 (9th Cir.) (447 F.3d 625) (May 9, 2006) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. MacEwan, No. 05-1421 (3rd Cir.) (445 F.3d 237) (April 5, 2006) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, No. 05-184 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 557; 126 S.Ct. 2749) (June 29, 2006) (Justice Stevens)
More from these topics:
- Two Re-Entry Non-Profit Leaders in Tennessee and Massachusetts Accused of Criminal Charges, Nov. 1, 2025. housing, jobs, halfway houses, Health care, Restrictions, discrimination, Bribery/Extortion/Theft, Prior Conviction/Sentence/Incarceration, Bank Fraud/Robbery/Theft, Mandatory Minimums.
- Rikers Island Staffers, Contractor and Detainee Sentenced for Smuggling, May 1, 2025. War on Drugs, Drug Mixtures/Purity, Mandatory Minimums.
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Miscalculated Sentencing Guidelines Range by Implausibly Finding Defendant Would Use All Cash Proceeds of Drug Sales Seized to Purchase More Meth to Resell, July 15, 2022. War on Drugs, Mandatory Minimums.
- Second Circuit: District Court Required to Explain Rationale for Reducing Sentence to ‘Time Served’ Under First Step Act but Refused to Reduce Supervised Release Portion of Sentence Despite Being Longer Than New Mandatory Minimum, March 15, 2022. First Step Act, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Mandatory Minimums.
- SCOTUS: § 2(a) of Fair Sentencing Act Modifies Statutory Penalties Only for Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)— the Mandatory-Minimum Provisions, Sept. 15, 2021. Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Mandatory Minimums.
- Federal Judge: ‘Offense of Conviction’ Under Guidelines Excludes Relevant Conduct for Sentencing, Sept. 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Session’s Directive to Seek Harshest Sentencing Rescinded, Feb. 16, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.