U.S. v. Reeks, No. CR-04-82-B-W (D.Me.) (441 F.Supp.2d 123) (July 7, 2006) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
Loaded on June 1, 2006
published in Punch and Jurists
June 12, 2006
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
The rules regarding the timing and nature of sentences imposed on defendants who face sentencing in both federal and state courts have always been somewhat confusing - in part because of often dramatically different punishment schemes and customs that apply under the different state and Federal laws; in part because ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Vonner, No. 05-5295 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 560) (June 29, 2006) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. MacEwan, No. 05-1421 (3rd Cir.) (445 F.3d 237) (April 5, 2006) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
- U.S. v. Menyweather, No. 03-50496 (9th Cir.) (447 F.3d 625) (May 9, 2006) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Reeks, No. CR-04-82-B-W (D.Me.) (441 F.Supp.2d 123) (July 7, 2006) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
- U.S. v. Crisp, No. 05-12304 (11th Cir.) (454 F.3d 1285) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Estupinan, No. 05-16279 (11th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1336) (June 28, 2006) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 05 Crim. 0888 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (435 F.Supp.2d 330) (June 26, 2006) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 03-13226 (11th Cir.) (446 F.3d 1210) (April 20, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Powell, No. 05-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (451 F.3d 862) (June 23, 2006) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Levine v. Apker, No. 05-2590-pr (2nd Cir.) (455 F.3d 71) (July 10, 2006) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Meyer, No. 06-1283 (8th Cir.) (452 F.3d 998) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 05-1348 (3rd Cir.) (451 F.3d 154) (June 15, 2006) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 05-16645 (11th Cir.) (455 F.3d 1227) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the ATF, No. 03-5582 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 433) (July 3, 2006) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, No. 05-184 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 557; 126 S.Ct. 2749) (June 29, 2006) (Justice Stevens)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Nonexceptional Consecutive Terms of ‘Community Custody’ May Not Exceed Aggregate Term of 24 Months, May 15, 2024. Parole, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Multiple Sentences, Aggregate Sentence.
- Sixth Circuit: Sentence Procedurally Unreasonable Where District Court Failed to Explain Decision to Impose Consecutive Sentences and Substantively Unreasonable Where Court Improperly Weighed Sentencing Factors, Oct. 1, 2023. Failure to Explain Consequences, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Impermissible Factors.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- SCOTUS Announces § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii)’s Consecutive Sentence Mandate Not Applicable to § 924(j) Sentences, Aug. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules That Time Served for Concurrent Sentences Can Be Counted Only Once for Sentence Credit, April 24, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Montana Supreme Court Grants State Prisoner 604 Days in Sentence Credit, April 1, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Fifth Circuit: Consecutive Sentence for FTA Must Be Part of ‘Total Punishment,’ Not Merely a Stacked Sentence, Nov. 15, 2020. Total Punishment, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces Court Must Inform Defendant of Consecutive Sentencing Authority When Accepting Plea, July 15, 2020. Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.