U.S. v. Vonner, No. 05-5295 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 560) (June 29, 2006) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
Loaded on June 1, 2006
published in Punch and Jurists
June 12, 2006
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Adequacy.
Here a divided panel held that a within-guideline sentence was unreasonable due to a "lack of adequate explanation.".
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Vonner, No. 05-5295 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 560) (June 29, 2006) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. MacEwan, No. 05-1421 (3rd Cir.) (445 F.3d 237) (April 5, 2006) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
- U.S. v. Menyweather, No. 03-50496 (9th Cir.) (447 F.3d 625) (May 9, 2006) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Reeks, No. CR-04-82-B-W (D.Me.) (441 F.Supp.2d 123) (July 7, 2006) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
- U.S. v. Crisp, No. 05-12304 (11th Cir.) (454 F.3d 1285) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Estupinan, No. 05-16279 (11th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1336) (June 28, 2006) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 05 Crim. 0888 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.) (435 F.Supp.2d 330) (June 26, 2006) (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan)
- U.S. v. Maxwell, No. 03-13226 (11th Cir.) (446 F.3d 1210) (April 20, 2006) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Powell, No. 05-3047 (D.C. Cir.) (451 F.3d 862) (June 23, 2006) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
- Levine v. Apker, No. 05-2590-pr (2nd Cir.) (455 F.3d 71) (July 10, 2006) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Meyer, No. 06-1283 (8th Cir.) (452 F.3d 998) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 05-1348 (3rd Cir.) (451 F.3d 154) (June 15, 2006) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 05-16645 (11th Cir.) (455 F.3d 1227) (July 11, 2006) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the ATF, No. 03-5582 (6th Cir.) (452 F.3d 433) (July 3, 2006) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, No. 05-184 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 557; 126 S.Ct. 2749) (June 29, 2006) (Justice Stevens)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit: Asking Single Objectionable Question Insufficient to Justify Termination of Defendant’s Right to Pro Se Representation, Dec. 15, 2020. Self-representation, Adequacy, Prisoners' Rights.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.