Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Novak, No. 04-55838 (9th Cir.) (441 F.3d 819) (March 23, 2006) (Judge Consuelo M. Callahan)

Loaded on March 1, 2006 published in Punch and Jurists March 13, 2006
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Liens, Garnishments, Etc..

Here a divided panel held that the garnishment of ERISA pension benefits under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”) is not barred by the anti-alienation provisions of the ERISA statutes, 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1). The Court concluded the MVRA, in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 3613 (“Civil Remedies for Satisfaction ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Williams, No. 04-15128 (11th Cir.) (444 F.3d 1286) (April 6, 2006) (Judge Thomas M. Reavley)
  2. U.S. v. Afshari, No. 02-50355 (9th Cir.) (446 F.3d 915) (April 17, 2006) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Richardson, No. 04-3472 (8th Cir.) (439 F.3d 421) (March 3, 2006) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Molina, No. 04-13114 (11th Cir.) (443 F.3d 824) (March 24, 2006) (Judge William H. Jr. Pryor)
  5. U.S. v. McClain, No. 04-5887 (6th Cir.) (444 F.3d 537) (March 31, 2006) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Kim, No. 05-50112 (9th Cir.) (443 F.3d 1143) (April 10, 2006) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)
  7. Goldyn v. Hayes, No. 04-17338 (9th Cir.) (444 F.3d 1062) (April 11, 2006) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
  8. U.S. v. Novak, No. 04-55838 (9th Cir.) (441 F.3d 819) (March 23, 2006) (Judge Consuelo M. Callahan)
  9. U.S. v. Lopez, No. 04-2254 (8th Cir.) (443 F.3d 1026) (April 17, 2006) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)

More from these topics: