Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Hudson v. Michigan, No. 04-1360 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 586; 126 S.Ct. 2159) (June 15, 2006) (Justice Scalia)

Loaded on May 1, 2006 published in Punch and Jurists May 08, 2006
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Exclusionary Rule.

In this case, a sharply divided Supreme Court held that evidence seized by police officers in violation of the venerable “knock-and-announce” rule can be used at trial despite the constitutional violation. Writing for a 5 to 4 majority, Justice Scalia argued that the connection between the entry (which Michigan conceded ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Staten, No. 05-30055 (9th Cir.) (450 F.3d 384) (June 7, 2006) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)
  2. Hudson v. Michigan, No. 04-1360 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 586; 126 S.Ct. 2159) (June 15, 2006) (Justice Scalia)
  3. Hill v. McDonough, No. 05-8794 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 573; 126 S.Ct. 2096) (June 12, 2006) (Justice Kennedy)
  4. Zedner v. U.S., No. 05-5992 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 489; 126 S.Ct. 1976) (June 5, 2006) (Justice Alito)
  5. House v. Bell, No. 04-8990 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 518; 126 S.Ct. 2064) (June 12, 2006) (Justice Kennedy)
  6. U.S. v. Navedo-Concepcion, No. 05-2301 (1st Cir.) (450 F.3d 54) (June 9, 2006) (Judge Michael Boudin)
  7. U.S. v. Grier, No. 05-1698 (3rd Cir.) (449 F.3d 558) (June 6, 2006) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)

More from these topics: