Skip navigation

Anderson v. Terhune, No. 04-17237 (9th Cir.) (467 F.3d 1208) (November 8, 2006) (Judge Michael R. Hogan)

In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 473-74 (1966), the Supreme Court held that if a suspect indicates in any manner during questioning that he wishes to remain silent, the interrogation must cease. The Court reasoned that any statement taken after invocation of the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination privilege would constitute ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login