Skip navigation

U.S. v. Flanders, No. 05-10785 (5th Cir.) (468 F.3d 269) (October 20, 2006) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)

Courts are supposed to be in the business of enforcing the Constitution. But this panel of the Fifth Circuit apparently missed this part of its job description. Defendant Michael Flanders appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress child pornography found on his computer. He argues that the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login