U.S. v. Crudup, No. 05-4048 (4th Cir.) (461 F.3d 433) (August 7, 2006) (Judge Dennis W. Shedd)
In this case, the court addressed the hair-splitting issue of whether, in appeals from sentences imposed for revocation of supervised release, the courts should apply a "reasonableness" or a "plainly unreasonable" standard in the post-Booker world.
The defendant in this case, Christopher Crudup, repeatedly violated the terms of his supervised ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login