Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Van Hook v. Anderson, No. 03-4207 (6th Cir.) (488 F.3d 411) (May 24, 2007) (Judge David W. McKeague)

Loaded on April 1, 2007 published in Punch and Jurists April 23, 2007
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Edwards v. Arizona Rule.

In this decision, the Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, held by a vote of 8-7 that a criminal suspect in custody who invokes his right to a lawyer can re-initiate discussions with police through a family member even if a lawyer has not yet been provided. Under the rule established ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Sampson, No. 04-6001 (1st Cir.) (486 F.3d 13) (May 7, 2007) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  2. Van Hook v. Anderson, No. 03-4207 (6th Cir.) (488 F.3d 411) (May 24, 2007) (Judge David W. McKeague)
  3. U.S. v. C.M., No. 05-50585 (9th Cir.) (485 F.3d 492) (May 8, 2007) (Judge Wilkie D. Jr. Ferguson)
  4. In Re: Troff, No. 05-4244 (10th Cir.) (479 F.3d 1213) (May 9, 2007) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
  5. Los Angeles County v. Rettele, No. 06-605 (U.S. Supreme Court) (550 U.S. 609; 127 S.Ct. 1989) (May 21, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Brika, No. 05-4537 (6th Cir.) (487 F.3d 450) (May 23, 2007) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
  7. Schriro v. Landrigan, No. 05-1575 (U.S. Supreme Court) (550 U.S. 465; 127 S.Ct. 1933) (May 14, 2007) (Justice Thomas)

More from these topics: