Nichols v. U.S., No. 05-6452 (6th Cir.) (501 F.3d 542) (August 16, 2007) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2007
published in Punch and Jurists
August 27, 2007
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Future Change in the Law.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Jean-Pierre v. U.S. Attorney General, No. 06-13359 (11th Cir.) (500 F.3d 1315) (September 19, 2007) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Mayer, No. 06-50481 (9th Cir.) (490 F.3d 1129) (June 6, 2007) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 04-CR-1016 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (493 F.Supp.2d 537) (March 29, 2007) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 04-CR-1016 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (493 F.Supp.2d 526) (January 29, 2007) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
- Mayfield v. U.S., No. 04-1427-AA (D.Or.) (504 F.Supp.2d 1023) (September 26, 2007) (Judge Ann L. Aiken)
- Thomas v. Baca, No. CV 04-08448 DDP (C.D.Cal.) (514 F.Supp.2d 1201) (September 20, 2007) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Kozeny, No. 05 Cr. 518(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (493 F.Supp.2d 693) (July 16, 2007) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
- von Hofe v. U.S., No. 05-2969-cv (2nd Cir.) (492 F.3d 175) (June 27, 2007) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
- Richey v. Bradshaw, No. 01-3477 (6th Cir.) (498 F.3d 344) (August 10, 2007) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
- Nichols v. U.S., No. 05-6452 (6th Cir.) (501 F.3d 542) (August 16, 2007) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- Cornejo v. County of San Diego, No. 05-56202 (9th Cir.) (504 F.3d 893) (September 24, 2007) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Martignon, No. 04-5649-cr (2nd Cir.) (492 F.3d 140) (June 13, 2007) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
More from these topics:
- California Supreme Court: Defendant Doesn’t Forfeit Claim for Failing to Object to Expert’s Testimonial Hearsay at Trial That Occurred Before Sanchez Was Decided, April 15, 2020. Future Change in the Law, Confrontation Clause.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.