U.S. v. Sexton, No. 05-6412 (6th Cir.) (512 F.3d 326) (January 11, 2007) (Judge John M. Rogers)
This case is noted for Judge Merritt’s dissent in which he sharply criticized the federal courts for engaging in "guidelineism”, or “guidelinitis” when imposing sentences, or the inability of the courts to break the habit of relying on the Guidelines only.
This secision is noted for Judge Merritt's passionate dissent ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login