Irons v. Carey, No. 05-15275 (9th Cir.) (479 F.3d 658) (March 6, 2007) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
While neither the facts nor the outcome of his habeas case are particularly significant, its history and its undercurrents are fascinating. Nearly two years ago, in an order published at 408 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. May 18, 2005) (“Irons I”), two of the judges on this panel issued an ominous ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login