Skip navigation

Pruitt v. Mote, No. 05-1620 (7th Cir.) (472 F.3d 484) (December 28, 2006) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Here a divided panel held that the district court had not abused its discretion by failing to appoint counsel for an in forma pauperis prisoner who brought a ยง 1983 action alleging that he was sexually assaulted by a prison guard.

Plaintiff inmate appealed from a judgment of the District ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login