U.S. v. Ministro-Tapia, No. 05-5101-pr (2nd Cir.) (470 F.3d 137) (November 28, 2006) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Booker, and the emphasis it placed on the “reasonableness” of a sentence, numerous commentators have noted that the appellate courts seem to have ignored the so-called “parsimony provision” of the Federal sentencing statutes - namely the mandate contained in 18 U.S.C. § ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login