Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (486 F.3d 177) (May 18, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)

Loaded on July 1, 2007 published in Punch and Jurists July 02, 2007
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, 911 Calls.

In U.S. v. Arnold, 434 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. Nov. 23, 2005) (“Arnold I”) (P&J, 07/25/05), the Sixth Circuit held that a tape recording of a complainant’s 911 call was not admissible under the “excited utterance” exception to the hearsay rule (see Rule 803(2) of the Fed.R.Evid.) because it lacked ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (486 F.3d 177) (May 18, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  2. U.S. v. Lopez-Vanegas, No. 05-15021 (11th Cir.) (493 F.3d 1305) (July 26, 2007) (Judge Donald E. Walter)
  3. U.S. v. Griffin, No. Crim. No. 05-10175-WGY (D.Mass.) (494 F.Supp.2d 1) (June 6, 2007) (Judge William G. Young)
  4. Stein v. KPMG, LLP, No. 06-4358-cv (2nd Cir.) (486 F.3d 753) (May 23, 2007) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
  5. U.S. v. Pineda-Arrellano, No. 06-41156 (5th Cir.) (492 F.3d 624) (July 17, 2007) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
  6. U.S. v. Carriles, No. EP-07-CR-00087-KC (W.D.Tex.) (486 F.Supp.2d 599) (May 8, 2007) (Judge Kathleen Cardone)
  7. U.S. v. Poynter, No. 05-6508 (6th Cir.) (495 F.3d 349) (July 26, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  8. U.S. v. Sampson, No. 04-6001 (1st Cir.) (497 F.3d 55) (July 27, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  9. U.S. v. Frank, No. 04-20778-CR-JORDAN (S.D.Fla.) (486 F.Supp.2d 1353) (May 4, 2007) (Judge Adalberto Jose Jordan)
  10. U.S. v. Alverez-Tejeda, No. 06-30289 (9th Cir.) (491 F.3d 1013) (June 8, 2007) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
  11. U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (434 F.3d 396) (November 23, 2005) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: