Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (486 F.3d 177) (May 18, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)

Loaded on July 1, 2007 published in Punch and Jurists July 02, 2007
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, 911 Calls.

In U.S. v. Arnold, 434 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. Nov. 23, 2005) (“Arnold I”) (P&J, 07/25/05), the Sixth Circuit held that a tape recording of a complainant’s 911 call was not admissible under the “excited utterance” exception to the hearsay rule (see Rule 803(2) of the Fed.R.Evid.) because it lacked …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (486 F.3d 177) (May 18, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  2. U.S. v. Griffin, No. Crim. No. 05-10175-WGY (D.Mass.) (494 F.Supp.2d 1) (June 6, 2007) (Judge William G. Young)
  3. U.S. v. Lopez-Vanegas, No. 05-15021 (11th Cir.) (493 F.3d 1305) (July 26, 2007) (Judge Donald E. Walter)
  4. U.S. v. Frank, No. 04-20778-CR-JORDAN (S.D.Fla.) (486 F.Supp.2d 1353) (May 4, 2007) (Judge Adalberto Jose Jordan)
  5. U.S. v. Sampson, No. 04-6001 (1st Cir.) (497 F.3d 55) (July 27, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Poynter, No. 05-6508 (6th Cir.) (495 F.3d 349) (July 26, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  7. U.S. v. Carriles, No. EP-07-CR-00087-KC (W.D.Tex.) (486 F.Supp.2d 599) (May 8, 2007) (Judge Kathleen Cardone)
  8. U.S. v. Pineda-Arrellano, No. 06-41156 (5th Cir.) (492 F.3d 624) (July 17, 2007) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
  9. Stein v. KPMG, LLP, No. 06-4358-cv (2nd Cir.) (486 F.3d 753) (May 23, 2007) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
  10. U.S. v. Alverez-Tejeda, No. 06-30289 (9th Cir.) (491 F.3d 1013) (June 8, 2007) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
  11. U.S. v. Arnold, No. 04-5384 (6th Cir.) (434 F.3d 396) (November 23, 2005) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: