Skip navigation

U.S. v. Larson, No. 05-30076 (9th Cir.) (495 F.3d 1094) (August 1, 2007) (Judge Richard A. Paez)

In a much criticized decision previously reported at U.S. v. Larson, 460 F.3d 1200 (9th Cir. 2006) (P&J, 08/07/06) (Larson I), a three-judge panel held that the district court had not erred when it concluded that no Confrontation Clause violation occurred when the defendants, Patricia Ann Larson and Leon Nels …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login