U.S. v. Larson, No. 05-30076 (9th Cir.) (495 F.3d 1094) (August 1, 2007) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
In a much criticized decision previously reported at U.S. v. Larson, 460 F.3d 1200 (9th Cir. 2006) (P&J, 08/07/06) (Larson I), a three-judge panel held that the district court had not erred when it concluded that no Confrontation Clause violation occurred when the defendants, Patricia Ann Larson and Leon Nels ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login