Crater v. Galaza, No. 05-17027 (9th Cir.) (491 F.3d 1119) (July 9, 2007) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
This case is noted for its exceptionally detailed analysis of, and it strong rejection of, a series of broad constitutional challenges to the AEDPA, including claims that one provision of the law, namely 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), (a) violates the Suspension Clause because it limits the grounds for Federal habeas …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login