Skip navigation

Crater v. Galaza, No. 05-17027 (9th Cir.) (491 F.3d 1119) (July 9, 2007) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)

This case is noted for its exceptionally detailed analysis of, and it strong rejection of, a series of broad constitutional challenges to the AEDPA, including claims that one provision of the law, namely 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254(d)(1), (a) violates the Suspension Clause because it limits the grounds for Federal habeas ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login