Skip navigation

U.S. v. Christman, No. 06-3266 (6th Cir.) (509 F.3d 299) (November 20, 2007) (Judge Richard Allen Griffin)

This is an interesting decision that highlights what Judge Boggs referred to in his dissent as a “genuine conundrum” - namely what can - or should - be done when a sentencing judge acknowledges - long after a sentence has been imposed - that a sentence was based on a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login