Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hamad, No. 05-4196 (6th Cir.) (495 F.3d 241) (July 19, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)

Here the Court addressed a sentencing issue that is substantially unresolved - namely, what due process rights does a defendant have at sentencing; and the Court held that, at a minimum, he has to right to challenge erroneous information.

U.S. v. Hamad, 495 F.3d 241 (6th Cir. July 19, 2007) ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login