Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kattaria, No. 06-3903 (8th Cir.) (503 F.3d 703) (October 5, 2007) (Judge James B. Loken)

Loaded on Sept. 1, 2007 published in Punch and Jurists September 10, 2007
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Probable Cause.

In a decision that quickly drew a torrent of negative commentary as a “radical departure” from firmly established Fourth Amendment law, the Court held that a thermal imaging warrant requires only reasonable suspicion - and not probable cause.

In 2004, Minnesota law enforcement officials applied for and received a warrant ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Kattaria, No. 06-3903 (8th Cir.) (503 F.3d 703) (October 5, 2007) (Judge James B. Loken)
  2. U.S. v. Jenkins, No. 06-50049 (9th Cir.) (494 F.3d 1135) (July 17, 2007) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
  3. U.S. v. Kilkenny, No. 05-6847-cr (2nd Cir.) (493 F.3d 122) (July 5, 2007) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
  4. U.S. v. Sabhnani, No. 07-2567-cr(L) (2nd Cir.) (493 F.3d 63) (July 6, 2007) (Judge Reena Raggi)
  5. U.S. v. Hamad, No. 05-4196 (6th Cir.) (495 F.3d 241) (July 19, 2007) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  6. U.S. v. Jenkins, No. 06-50049 (9th Cir.) (504 F.3d 694) (September 25, 2007) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
  7. U.S. v. Zackery, No. 06-1930 (8th Cir.) (494 F.3d 644) (July 12, 2007) (Judge James B. Loken)
  8. Stewart v. Erwin, No. 05-4635 (6th Cir.) (503 F.3d 488) (October 9, 2007) (Judge Gerald E. Rosen)

More from these topics: