Skip navigation

U.S. v. Saeteurn, No. 06-10401 (9th Cir.) (504 F.3d 1175) (October 15, 2007) (Judge Carlos T. Bea)

Here the Court held that a sentencing judge is not required to resolve disputes regarding facts recited in a PSR, “when those facts do not affect the term of imprisonment imposed, but may affect how the sentence is served, includiung early release.

Following a sting operation, the defendant in this ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login