Skip navigation

Oregon v. Ice, No. 07-901 (U.S. Supreme Court) (555 U.S. 160; 129 S.Ct. 711) (January 14, 2009) (Justice Ginsburg)

The issue before the Court in this case was whether the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), is violated by the imposition of consecutive sentences based on the sentencing judge’s determination of a fact (other ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login