Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kahn, No. MJ-07-536-JPD (W.D.Wash.) (524 F.Supp.2d 1278) (December 18, 2007) (Judge Magistrate)

Loaded on Feb. 1, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists February 04, 2008
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Statutory Interpretation.

Here the Court held, as a matter of first impression, that the mandatory pretrial electronic monitoring conditions of the Adam Walsh Act did not apply to the defendant, since those conditions apply only in cases involving a “minor victim”.

This is an interesting decision involving an issue of first impression ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Clark v. Perez, No. 06-5340-pr (2nd Cir.) (510 F.3d 382) (January 3, 2008) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  2. U.S. v. Grant, No. CR 05-813 JSL (C.D.Cal.) (524 F.Supp.2d 1204) (November 30, 2007) (Judge J. Spencer Letts)
  3. Sample v. Miles, No. 05-50624 (5th Cir.) (239 Fed.Appx. 14) (February 9, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Liddell, No. 07-1337 (8th Cir.) (517 F.3d 1007) (February 25, 2008) (Judge James B. Loken)
  5. U.S. v. Kahn, No. MJ-07-536-JPD (W.D.Wash.) (524 F.Supp.2d 1278) (December 18, 2007) (Judge Magistrate)

More from these topics: