Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Anderson v. Terhune, No. 04-17237 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 781) (February 15, 2008) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists January 21, 2008
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Presumption of Correctness.

Here the en banc court reversed a prior decision which had held that when a defendant states to a policeman “I plead the Fifth,” that statement was not a sufficiently clear and unambiguous invocation of the defendant’s Miranda rights to stop interrogation.

In Anderson v. Terhune, 467 F.3d 1206 (9th ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Elfgeeh, No. 06-0638-cr (2nd Cir.) (515 F.3d 100) (February 14, 2008) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
  2. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273 (U.S. Supreme Court) (552 U.S. 264; 128 S.Ct. 1029) (February 20, 2008) (Justice Stevens)
  3. Anderson v. Terhune, No. 04-17237 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 781) (February 15, 2008) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  4. U.S. v. Pesaturo, No. 06-10390-MLW (D.Mass.) (519 F.Supp.2d 177) (October 9, 2007) (Judge Magistrate)
  5. U.S. v. Auster, No. 07-30084 (5th Cir.) (517 F.3d 312) (February 11, 2008) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
  6. U.S. v. Forrester, No. 05-50410 (9th Cir.) (512 F.3d 500) (January 7, 2008) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  7. Crater v. Galaza, No. 05-17027 (9th Cir.) (508 F.3d 1261) (December 6, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  8. Arrington v. Daniels, No. 06-35855 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 1106) (February 20, 2008) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)

More from these topics: