Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Anderson v. Terhune, No. 04-17237 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 781) (February 15, 2008) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists January 21, 2008
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Presumption of Correctness.

Here the en banc court reversed a prior decision which had held that when a defendant states to a policeman “I plead the Fifth,” that statement was not a sufficiently clear and unambiguous invocation of the defendant’s Miranda rights to stop interrogation.

In Anderson v. Terhune, 467 F.3d 1206 (9th …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Arrington v. Daniels, No. 06-35855 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 1106) (February 20, 2008) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
  2. Crater v. Galaza, No. 05-17027 (9th Cir.) (508 F.3d 1261) (December 6, 2007) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Forrester, No. 05-50410 (9th Cir.) (512 F.3d 500) (January 7, 2008) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  4. U.S. v. Auster, No. 07-30084 (5th Cir.) (517 F.3d 312) (February 11, 2008) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
  5. U.S. v. Pesaturo, No. 06-10390-MLW (D.Mass.) (519 F.Supp.2d 177) (October 9, 2007) (Judge Magistrate)
  6. Anderson v. Terhune, No. 04-17237 (9th Cir.) (516 F.3d 781) (February 15, 2008) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  7. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273 (U.S. Supreme Court) (552 U.S. 264; 128 S.Ct. 1029) (February 20, 2008) (Justice Stevens)
  8. U.S. v. Elfgeeh, No. 06-0638-cr (2nd Cir.) (515 F.3d 100) (February 14, 2008) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)

More from these topics: