Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Bismullah v. Gates, No. 06-1197 (D.C. Cir.) (514 F.3d 1291) (February 1, 2008) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists January 07, 2008
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here, splitting evenly, the Court declined to reconsider en banc an earlier ruling that ordered the Government to provide a wide array of information to eight Guantanamo Bay detainees who were challenging their designation as enemy combatants.

In an earlier decision in this case, in response to a lawsuit brought ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Bismullah v. Gates, No. 06-1197 (D.C. Cir.) (514 F.3d 1291) (February 1, 2008) (Per Curiam)
  2. U.S. v. Dorsey, No. 06-16698 (11th Cir.) (512 F.3d 1321) (January 14, 2008) (Judge Charles R. Wilson)
  3. U.S. v. Newsom, No. 06-10822 (5th Cir.) (508 F.3d 731) (November 16, 2007) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
  4. Kessack v. U.S., No. C05-1828Z (W.D.Wash.) (2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7739) (January 18, 2008) (Judge Thomas S. Zilly)
  5. U.S. v. Anim, No. 4:06-cr-00218 (S.D.Iowa) (519 F.Supp.2d 968) (November 5, 2007) (Judge Robert W. Pratt)
  6. U.S. v. Shrake, No. 07-1790 (7th Cir.) (515 F.3d 743) (February 6, 2008) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

More from these topics: