Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Kyllo v. U.S., No. 99-8508 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 27; 121 S.Ct. 2038) (June 11, 2001) (Justice Scalia)

Loaded on Jan. 2, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists May 21, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Searches - Thermal Imager.

In this case, a sharply divided Supreme Court ruled that the use by police of a thermal imaging device to detect heat patterns coming from a private home is a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; and therefore is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant.

Here, after receiving tips ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Kyllo v. U.S., No. 99-8508 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 27; 121 S.Ct. 2038) (June 11, 2001) (Justice Scalia)
  2. Alabama v. Bozeman, No. 00-492 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 146; 121 S.Ct. 2079) (June 11, 2001) (Justice Breyer)
  3. U.S. v. Kimes, No. 00-5144 (6th Cir.) (246 F.3d 800) (April 13, 2001) (Judge David A. Nelson)
  4. Idaho v. Horiuchi, No. 98-30149 (9th Cir.) (253 F.3d 359) (June 5, 2001) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
  5. U.S. v. Dove, No. 00-4248 (4th Cir.) (247 F.3d 153) (April 13, 2001) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
  6. In Re: Sealed Case, No. 00-3057 (D.C. Cir.) (246 F.3d 696) (April 24, 2001) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
  7. U.S. v. Stewart, No. 00-3033 (D.C. Cir.) (246 F.3d 728) (May 1, 2001) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
  8. U.S. v. Strayhorn, No. 99-5203 (6th Cir.) (250 F.3d 462) (May 22, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

More from these topics: