U.S. v. Johnson, No. 06-0594-cr (2nd Cir.) (529 F.3d 493) (June 19, 2008) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
Loaded on July 1, 2008
published in Punch and Jurists
July 28, 2008
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Hearsay Evidence.
Conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base is affirmed where: 1) although the government's egregious act of eliciting improper testimonial evidence from its witness should not be condoned, defendant's failure to make objections to those abusive evidentiary presentations limited the standard of review to plain error; and 2) accounting for ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. King, No. 1:98-CR-001 BSJ (D.Utah) (551 F.Supp.2d 1298) (March 14, 2008) (Judge Bruce S. Jenkins)
- U.S. v. Legros, No. 05-2828-cr (2nd Cir.) (529 F.3d 470) (June 17, 2008) (Judge Robert D. Sack)
- U.S. v. Straub, No. 07-30182 (9th Cir.) (538 F.3d 1147) (August 15, 2008) (Judge Jay S. Bybee)
- U.S. v. Campa, No. 01-17176 (11th Cir.) (529 F.3d 980) (June 4, 2008) (Judge William H. Jr. Pryor)
- U.S. v. Booker, No. CR-08-19-B-W (D.Me.) (557 F.Supp.2d 153) (August 11, 2008) (Judge John A. Jr. Woodcock)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 06-0594-cr (2nd Cir.) (529 F.3d 493) (June 19, 2008) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- U.S. v. Askew, No. 04-3092 (D.C. Cir.) (529 F.3d 1119) (June 20, 2008) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
- U.S. v. Parris, No. 05-CR-636 (FB) (S-2) (E.D.N.Y.) (573 F.Supp.2d 774) (August 14, 2008) (Judge Frederic Block)
- U.S. v. Rausch, No. 07-cr-00497-JLK (D.Colo.) (570 F.Supp.2d 1295) (August 12, 2008) (Judge John L. Jr. Kane)
- U.S. v. Reynolds, No. Misc. No. H-07-0699 (S.D.Tex.) (553 F.Supp.2d 788) (April 10, 2008) (Judge Simeon T. III Lake)
- U.S. v. Porter, No. 03-CR-0129(CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (555 F.Supp.2d 341) (April 11, 2008) (Judge Charles P. Sifton)
- Arar v. Ashcroft, No. 06-4216-cv (2nd Cir.) (532 F.3d 157) (June 30, 2008) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
More from these topics:
- Mississippi Supreme Court Vacates Convictions, Holding Multiple Errors by State Resulted in ‘Legal Chaos’ That Deprived Defendant of Right to Fair Trial Under ‘Cumulative-Error Doctrine’, May 15, 2025. Fifth Amendment, Prejudicial Spillover, Hearsay Evidence, Graphic and Inflammatory Evidence.
- Maryland Supreme Court Clarifies Process for Admitting Co-Conspirator’s Hearsay Statements During Police Interview Under ‘Declaration Against Penal Interest’ Exception, Trial Court Must ‘Parse’ Interview to Determine Admissibility of Each Statement, Feb. 1, 2025. Standard of Review, Police Interrogations, Evidence - Admissibility, Hearsay Evidence, Co-conspirator Statements.
- Washington Appellate Court Reverses Parole Revocation Based on Hearsay, Nov. 15, 2024. Hearsay Evidence, Revocation Proceedings.
- Rhode Island Supreme Court Holds Temporal Requirement of ‘Recent Fabrication’ Exception to Hearsay Rule Not Satisfied and Scribbled Note Made by Child Victim of Sexual Abuse Years After Alleged Events Not ‘Excited Utterance’, Oct. 1, 2024. Sexual Abuse of a Minor, Sexual Abuse - Aggravated, Fabrication of Evidence, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Hearsay Evidence.
- First Circuit: Sentencing May Not Be Based Upon Unreliable Hearsay Testimony, Aug. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Unreliable and Unsubstantiated Assertions, Hearsay Evidence.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Missouri Supreme Court: Use of Out-of-Court Statement Admitted at Trial Exceeded Limited Purpose of Exception to Rule Against Hearsay Upon Which It Was Admitted, Feb. 15, 2023. Hearsay Evidence.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Eighth Circuit: Inadmissible Hearsay Improperly Used to Revoke Supervised Release, Feb. 15, 2022. Hearsay Evidence, Revocation Proceedings.
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Announces Framework for Determining Whether State of Mind Exception to Hearsay Rule Applies to Out-of-Court Statements, Dual-Purpose Statements Generally Inadmissible, Dec. 15, 2021. Hearsay Evidence.