Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Doe v. Bredesen, No. 06-6393 (6th Cir.) (521 F.3d 680) (March 31, 2008) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on March 1, 2008 published in Punch and Jurists March 03, 2008
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, GPS Tracking Device.

In Doe v. Bredesen, 507 F.3d 998 (6th Cir. Nov. 16, 2007) (P&J, 10/15/07) (“Doe I”), a divided panel from the Sixth Circuit concluded that a new Tennessee law that required all convicted sex offenders to wear a new GPS tracking device did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Ibanga, No. 06-4738 (4th Cir.) (271 Fed.Appx. 298) (April 1, 2008) (Per Curiam)
  2. U.S. v. Gracia, No. 07-40245 (5th Cir.) (522 F.3d 597) (March 31, 2008) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Wiener)
  3. U.S. v. Carty, No. 05-10200 (9th Cir.) (520 F.3d 984) (March 24, 2008) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
  4. U.S. v. Polizzi, No. 06-cr-22 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (549 F.Supp.2d 308) (April 1, 2008) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  5. Doe v. Bredesen, No. 06-6393 (6th Cir.) (521 F.3d 680) (March 31, 2008) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Hernandez-Vasquez, No. 06-50198 (9th Cir.) (513 F.3d 908) (January 22, 2008) (Judge Jeremy Fogel)
  7. U.S. v. Dupes, No. 05-5522-cr(L) (2nd Cir.) (513 F.3d 338) (January 9, 2008) (Judge John F. Keenan)
  8. U.S. v. DeMott, No. 05-4285-cr(L) (2nd Cir.) (513 F.3d 55) (January 15, 2008) (Per Curiam)
  9. Medellin v. Texas, No. 06-984 (U.S. Supreme Court) (552 U.S. 491; 128 S.Ct. 1346) (March 25, 2008) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  10. In Re Motion For Release of Court Records, No. Misc. 07-01 (F.I.S.C.) (526 F.Supp.2d 484) (December 11, 2007) (Judge John D. Bates)

More from these topics: