Skip navigation

U.S. v. Glynn, No. 06 Cr. 580 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (578 F.Supp.2d 567) (September 22, 2008) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)

This is an important and erudite decision that raises significant questions regarding both the scientific accuracy and the admissibility of ballistics evidence at criminal trials. The decision builds on a theme espoused by a number of judges in several recent cases that have suddenly cast serious doubts on ballistics evidence, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login