Skip navigation

U.S. v. Davis, No. 05-3784 (6th Cir.) (537 F.3d 611) (August 12, 2008) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)

Here, on remand from the Supreme Court, the Court held that the district court's second explanation for its sentence, namely a 14-year gap between the defendant's crimes and his second sentencing hearing, was an inappropriate sentencing consideration.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login