Skip navigation

U.S. v. Huezo, No. 07-0031-cr (2nd Cir.) (546 F.3d 174) (October 10, 2008) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)

Here the Court abrogated, as misleading and inconsistent with the constitution, the prevailing rule that once a conspiracy has been established, only “slight evidence” or evidence that is not “overwhelming” is necessary to link the defendant to it.

In this case, a divided panel from the Second Circuit held that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login