Ventry v. U.S., No. 06-3104-pr (2nd Cir.) (539 F.3d 102) (August 15, 2008) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2008
published in Punch and Jurists
September 22, 2008
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus, based on a claim that ineffective counsel led to his conviction for attempted armed robbery, is vacated where attorneys, one or both whom may have encouraged petitioner to tamper with a witness, may have violated provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Lemoine, No. 06-50663 (9th Cir.) (546 F.3d 1042) (October 9, 2008) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
- U.S. v. Graziano, No. 07-CR-0508 (JFB) (E.D.N.Y.) (616 F.Supp.2d 350) (September 10, 2008) (Judge Joseph F. Bianco)
- Bull v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 05-17080 (9th Cir.) (539 F.3d 1193) (August 22, 2008) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
- U.S. v. Marcus, No. 07-4005-cr (2nd Cir.) (538 F.3d 97) (August 14, 2008) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hamilton, No. 06-2933-cr (2nd Cir.) (538 F.3d 162) (August 15, 2008) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- U.S. v. Valentine, No. 06-5648-cr (2nd Cir.) (539 F.3d 88) (August 5, 2008) (Judge Alan H. Nevas)
- U.S. v. Keller, No. 07-3330-cr (2nd Cir.) (539 F.3d 97) (August 14, 2008) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Guevara-Umana, No. 07-1410-cr (2nd Cir.) (538 F.3d 139) (August 15, 2008) (Per Curiam)
- McKithen v. Brown, No. 02-CV-1670 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) (565 F.Supp.2d 440) (July 21, 2008) (Judge John Gleeson)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 05-3784 (6th Cir.) (537 F.3d 611) (August 12, 2008) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- U.S. v. Huezo, No. 07-0031-cr (2nd Cir.) (546 F.3d 174) (October 10, 2008) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Doe, No. 06-4124-cr (2nd Cir.) (537 F.3d 204) (August 13, 2008) (Judge Denise Cote)
- U.S. v. Ressam, No. 05-30422 (9th Cir.) (538 F.3d 1166) (August 15, 2008) (Per Curiam)
- Ventry v. U.S., No. 06-3104-pr (2nd Cir.) (539 F.3d 102) (August 15, 2008) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
- Wyoming Ex Rel. Crank v. U.S., No. 07-8046 (10th Cir.) (539 F.3d 1236) (August 26, 2008) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Ogando, No. 05-0236-cr (L) (2nd Cir.) (547 F.3d 102) (October 20, 2008) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- U.S. v. Thurston, No. 05-2271 (1st Cir.) (544 F.3d 22) (October 2, 2008) (Judge Jeffrey R. Howard)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Defense Counsel Had Actual Conflict of Interest Where Own Performance During Police Interview of Defendant Could Serve as Basis of Motion to Suppress Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial Required W, March 15, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Conflict of Interest.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.