U.S. v. Kelley, No. 06-5536-cr (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 171) (January 5, 2009) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2009
published in Punch and Jurists
February 09, 2009
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Relevance.
A conviction for securities fraud and wire fraud is affirmed where: 1) although the use of bogus account statements to lull defrauded investors is not in and of itself sufficient to establish a securities law violation, the use of such statements is relevant as evidence to prove, inter alia, a ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Fisher v. City of San Jose, No. 04-16095 (9th Cir.) (558 F.3d 1069) (March 11, 2009) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)
- Bismullah v. Gates, No. 06-1197 (D.C. Cir.) (551 F.3d 1068) (January 9, 2009) (Judge Douglas Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Berry, No. 07-1251 (3rd Cir.) (553 F.3d 273) (January 6, 2009) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
- Dolphy v. Mantello, No. 03-2738-pr (L) (2nd Cir.) (552 F.3d 236) (January 9, 2009) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. Horn, No. 3:01-cr-00142 (M.D.Tenn.) (590 F.Supp.2d 976) (December 16, 2008) (Judge Thomas A. Jr. Wiseman)
- U.S. v. Esparza, No. 07-50293 (9th Cir.) (552 F.3d 1088) (January 20, 2009) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Osborne, No. 2:08cr33-MHT (M.D.Ala.) (590 F.Supp.2d 1330) (December 19, 2008) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Luedtke, No. 08-CR-189 (E.D.Wisc.) (589 F.Supp.2d 1018) (November 18, 2008) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 07-2436-cr (2nd Cir.) (558 F.3d 166) (March 5, 2009) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- U.S. v. Spinelli, No. 99-1344-cr(L) (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 159) (December 31, 2008) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- U.S. v. White, No. 07-1180-cr (2nd Cir.) (552 F.3d 240) (January 9, 2009) (Judge Debra Ann Livingston)
- U.S. v. Hayes, No. 07-0063-cr (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 138) (December 24, 2008) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- U.S. v. Kelley, No. 06-5536-cr (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 171) (January 5, 2009) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Farinella, No. 08-1839 (7th Cir.) (558 F.3d 695) (March 12, 2009) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Easter, No. 07-2433 (7th Cir.) (553 F.3d 519) (January 16, 2009) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 07-3003-cr (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 187) (January 8, 2009) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Uddin, No. 07-3121-cr (2nd Cir.) (551 F.3d 176) (January 6, 2009) (Judge Robert A. Katzmann)
- U.S. v. Connolly, No. 06-3139-cr (2nd Cir.) (552 F.3d 86) (December 4, 2008) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
More from these topics:
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Warrant to Search Cellphone Must Establish Nexus Between Device and Offense Beyond ‘Boilerplate’ Language About Cellphones Being Ubiquitous and Used in Crimes, Sept. 15, 2022. Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Relevance.
- Michigan Supreme Court: Police Must Limit Search of Cellphone Data to Uncovering Evidence of the Criminal Activity Alleged in Warrant, Feb. 15, 2021. Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Searchable Metadata, Relevance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.