U.S. v. Miller, No. 06-45 (W.D.Mich.) (588 F.Supp.2d 789) (November 6, 2008) (Judge David M. Lawson)
This decision contains an excellent survey of the current state of the law on the ability of the Government to garnish pension plan distributions of a defendant in order to enforce his or her restitution obligations, notwithstanding the so-called anti-alienation provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), namely ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login