Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Smedley, No. 4:09 CR 99 CAS (E.D.Mo.) (611 F.Supp.2d 971) (April 22, 2009) (Judge Magistrate)

Loaded on June 1, 2009 published in Punch and Jurists June 29, 2009
Filed under: Due Process, Punch And Jurists.

In this decision, Magistrate Judge Noce became the eighth Federal judge to hold that the mandatory conditions of release contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B), a portion of the Adam Walsh Child Protection Safety Act of 2006 (the “Adam Walsh Act”) violate the Due Process Clause and are unconstitutional.

The ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Bacha v. Obama, No. Civ. No. 05-2385 (ESH) (D.D.C.) (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61310) (July 17, 2009) (Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle)
  2. U.S. v. Feemster, No. 06-2059 (8th Cir.) (572 F.3d 455) (July 13, 2009) (Judge Lavenski R. Smith)
  3. U.S. v. Weatherton, No. 08-30542 (5th Cir.) (567 F.3d 149) (May 1, 2009) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
  4. U.S. v. Lloyd, No. 08-2513 (3rd Cir.) (566 F.3d 341) (May 27, 2009) (Judge Thomas Michael Hardiman)
  5. U.S. v. Knox, No. 06-4101 (7th Cir.) (573 F.3d 441) (July 20, 2009) (Judge John Daniel Tinder)
  6. U.S. v. Smedley, No. 4:09 CR 99 CAS (E.D.Mo.) (611 F.Supp.2d 971) (April 22, 2009) (Judge Magistrate)

More from these topics: