U.S. v. Amezcua-Vasquez, No. 07-50239 (9th Cir.) (586 F.3d 1176) (November 10, 2009) (Per Curiam)
In a ruling marked by the strong dissent of 7 judges, the full court declined to grant a rehearing en banc of a prior decision that was described as “the first published opinion . . . reversing a within-Guidelines sentence as substantively unreasonable”.
Recently, the Ninth Circuit became the first ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login