Iqbal v. Ashcroft, No. 05-6352-cv (2nd Cir.) (574 F.3d 820) (July 28, 2009) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2009
published in Punch and Jurists
September 07, 2009
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Pleading Requirements/Rules.
On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in light of the Court's decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal to decide whether plaintiff can seek leave to amend his deficient complaint.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Battista, No. 08-3750-cr (2nd Cir.) (575 F.3d 226) (August 6, 2009) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
- Iqbal v. Ashcroft, No. 05-6352-cv (2nd Cir.) (574 F.3d 820) (July 28, 2009) (Per Curiam)
- Nelson v. Correctional Medical Services, No. 07-2481 (8th Cir.) (583 F.3d 522) (October 2, 2009) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Perez, No. 08-4131-cr(CON) (2nd Cir.) (575 F.3d 164) (August 3, 2009) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- Hernandez-Carrera v. Carlson, No. 08-3097 (10th Cir.) (547 F.3d 1237) (November 12, 2008) (Judge Michael W. McConnell)
- Malik v. District of Columbia, No. 08-7046 (D.C. Cir.) (574 F.3d 781) (August 4, 2009) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- U.S. v. Hernandez-Arenado, No. 08-cv-278-JPG (N.D.Ill.) (624 F.Supp.2d 985) (June 9, 2008) (Judge J. Phil Gilbert)
- U.S. v. Taliaferro, No. 08-CR-7-1-SH (D.N.H.) (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89805) (September 1, 2009) (Judge Steven J. McAuliffe)
- Al Rabiah v. U.S., No. 02-828 (CKK) (D.D.C.) (658 F.Supp.2d 11) (September 17, 2009) (Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly)
- U.S. v. Simpson, No. 08-5293 (6th Cir.) (346 Fed. Appx. 10) (September 16, 2009) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
- Omar v. Geren, No. Civ. No. 05-2374 (RMU) (D.D.C.) (689 F.Supp.2d 1) (September 28, 2009) (Judge Ricardo M. Urbina)
- Crickon v. Thomas, No. 08-35250 (9th Cir.) (579 F.3d 978) (August 25, 2009) (Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson)
- Finigan v. Marshall, No. 07-0964-cv (2nd Cir.) (574 F.3d 57) (July 28, 2009) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- SEC v. Dorozhko, No. 08-0201-cv (2nd Cir.) (574 F.3d 42) (July 22, 2009) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces Untimely Notice of Appeal That Provides Reason for Tardiness May Be Construed as Motion to Reopen, May 15, 2024. Notice of Appeal/Appeal Rights, Pleading Requirements/Rules.
- Seventh Circuit Allows Wisconsin Prisoner to Amend Inartfully Pleaded Pro Se Complaint, Sept. 1, 2022. Pleading Requirements/Rules, Procedural Requirements.
- Sixth Circuit: Courts Must Construe Pro Se Notice of Appeal as Motion for Extension of Time to Appeal, Aug. 1, 2020. Exceptional Circumstances, Pleading Requirements/Rules, Timeliness of Motion.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.