Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Stephens, No. CR09-3037-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (669 F.Supp.2d 960) (November 17, 2009) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)

Loaded on April 19, 2010 published in Punch and Jurists April 19, 2010
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Mandatory Electronic Monitoring.



[Editor's Note: In U.S. v. Stephens, 594 F.3d 1033 (8th Cir. Feb 17, 2010) (Docket No. 09-3706), the Eighth Circuit held that the provision of Adam Walsh Act mandating electronic monitoring and curfew was not facially unconstitutional.].

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Carta, No. 09-1949 (1st Cir.) (592 F.3d 34) (January 15, 2010) (Judge Michael Boudin)
  2. U.S. v. Russell, No. 08-3120 (D.C. Cir.) (600 F.3d 631) (April 2, 2010) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
  3. Lopez v. Terrell, No. 09 Civ. 8148 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y.) (697 F.Supp.2d 549) (March 26, 2010) (Judge Richard J. Holwell)
  4. U.S. v. Stephens, No. CR09-3037-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (669 F.Supp.2d 960) (November 17, 2009) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
  5. U.S. v. Baker, No. 6:08-CR-99 (E.D.Tex.) (672 F.Supp.2d 771) (December 7, 2009) (Judge Leonard Davis)
  6. Appleby v. Warden, Northern Regional Jail, No. 07-7613 (4th Cir.) (595 F.3d 532) (February 19, 2010) (Judge G. Steven Agee)
  7. Serra v. Lappin, No. 08-15969 (9th Cir.) (600 F.3d 1191) (April 9, 2010) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  8. U.S. v. Polouizzi, No. 06-CR-22 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (697 F.Supp.2d 381) (March 23, 2010) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  9. U.S. v. Vasquez, No. 09-cr-259 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) (2010 WL 1257359) (March 30, 2010) (Judge John Gleeson)
  10. U.S. v. Polouizzi, No. 06-CR-22 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (687 F.Supp.2d 133) (January 20, 2010) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

More from these topics: