U.S. v. Ochoa, No. 14-10124 (9th Cir.) (809 F.3d 453) (October 22, 2015) (Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson)
The issue before the Court in this case was whether a sentencing court may, sua sponte, change a sentence once it has been orally imposed. The Defendant, Ramon Ochoa, contended that, consistent with the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login