U.S. v. Ochoa, No. 14-10124 (9th Cir.) (809 F.3d 453) (October 22, 2015) (Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson)
The issue before the Court in this case was whether a sentencing court may, sua sponte, change a sentence once it has been orally imposed. The Defendant, Ramon Ochoa, contended that, consistent with the plain language of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c) and Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login