Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Pool, No. 09-10303 (9th Cir.) (621 F.3d 1213) (September 14, 2010) (Judge Consuelo M. Callahan)

Loaded on Dec. 27, 2010 published in Punch and Jurists December 27, 2010
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Pre-Trial Detainees.

Here, a divided panel held that a provision of the Bail Reform Act requiring pretrial detainees to give DNA samples as a condition of pretrial release does not violate the Fourth Amendment under the “totality of the circumstances” test.

In this lengthy decision, a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Goyal, No. 08-10436 (9th Cir.) (629 F.3d 912) (December 10, 2010) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  2. U.S. v. Oluwanisola, No. 08-4442-cr (2nd Cir.) (605 F.3d 124) (May 21, 2010) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
  3. U.S. v. Preacely, No. 09-2580-cr (2nd Cir.) (628 F.3d 72) (December 21, 2010) (Judge J. Clifford Wallace)
  4. U.S. v. Warshak, No. 08-3997 (6th Cir.) (631 F.3d 266) (December 14, 2010) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
  5. U.S. v. Pool, No. 09-10303 (9th Cir.) (621 F.3d 1213) (September 14, 2010) (Judge Consuelo M. Callahan)
  6. U.S. v. Whigham, No. 06cr10328-NG (D.Mass.) (754 F.Supp.2d 239) (December 3, 2010) (Judge Nancy Gertner)

More from these topics: