Skip navigation

U.S. v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385 (9th Cir.) (591 F.3d 1212) (January 11, 2010) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)

Here the Court held that attaching various mobile tracking devices to a suspect’s vehicle on seven separate occasions and continuously monitoring his activities by using those tracking devices did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights.

The issue before the Court in this case was “whether law enforcement officers violate a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login