Skip navigation

U.S. v. MacPherson, No. 08-1829-cr (CON) (2nd Cir.) (590 F.3d 215) (December 30, 2009) (Per Curiam)

In this case, the defendant argued that the government violated a Pimentel-like non-binding plea agreement by advocating for a sentence higher than the estimate contained in the agreement. In the majority opinion, the court simply held that its precedents on this issue are in conflict, and that, given this, MacPherson, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login