U.S. v. MacPherson, No. 08-1829-cr (CON) (2nd Cir.) (590 F.3d 215) (December 30, 2009) (Per Curiam)
In this case, the defendant argued that the government violated a Pimentel-like non-binding plea agreement by advocating for a sentence higher than the estimate contained in the agreement. In the majority opinion, the court simply held that its precedents on this issue are in conflict, and that, given this, …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login