Renico v. Lett, No. 09-338 (U.S. Supreme Court) (559 U.S. 766; 130 S.Ct. 1855) (May 3, 2010) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
In theory, this case was about a double jeopardy issue - namely whether the defendant’s retrial on murder charges violated his double jeopardy rights under the U.S. Constitution because the state trial judge’s quick and sua sponte termination of the first trial was made without a finding of “manifest necessity” ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login