Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bennett, No. 06-50580 (9th Cir.) (621 F.3d 1131) (September 10, 2010) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)

Here the Court rejected the Government’s broad claim that an entity that did not meet the statutory definition of a “financial institution” under § 1344 could still be included within the scope of the statute if its parent corporation qualified.

This is an interesting decision for those in the legal ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login