Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kennedy, No. 10-30065 (9th Cir.) (643 F.3d 1250) (July 11, 2011) (Judge Sandra S. Ikuta)

Loaded on July 25, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists July 25, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court vacated a restitution order to the victims of a child pornography crime because the Government haf failed to prove that the defendant’s possession of those images had “proximately caused” the losses, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 2259.

The courts continue to debate the proper interpretation of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Curtis, No. 09-20491 (5th Cir.) (635 F.3d 704) (March 11, 2011) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
  2. U.S. v. Frownfelter, No. 09-4211 (10th Cir.) (626 F.3d 549) (December 1, 2010) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
  3. U.S. v. Evanston, No. 10-10159 (9th Cir.) (651 F.3d 1080) (July 5, 2011) (Judge Falcon B. Hawkins)
  4. Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, No. 09-7125 (D.C. Cir.) (654 F.3d 11) (July 8, 2011) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)
  5. U.S. v. Kennedy, No. 10-30065 (9th Cir.) (643 F.3d 1250) (July 11, 2011) (Judge Sandra S. Ikuta)
  6. Flomo v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co., No. 10-3675 (7th Cir.) (643 F.3d 1013) (July 11, 2011) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  7. Cooey v. Kasich, No. 2:04-vc-1156 (S.D.Ohio) ( F.Supp.2d ) (July 8, 2011) (Judge Gregory L. Frost)
  8. Henry v. Purnell, No. 08-7433 (4th Cir.) (652 F.3d 524) (July 14, 2011) (Judge Roger L. Gregory)

More from these topics: