Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Tinklenberg, No. 09-1498 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 647; 131 S.Ct. 2007) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer)

Loaded on June 13, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists June 13, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Periods of Delay.

In a tedious and labyrinthine decision involving the statutory interpretation of two different provisions of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (“STA”), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Circuit had incorrectly interpreted both provisions. However, the Court also concluded that the Circuit’s twin errors canceled each other out; and ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Tinklenberg, No. 09-1498 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 647; 131 S.Ct. 2007) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer)
  2. DePierre v. U.S., No. 09-1533 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 70; 131 S.Ct. 2225) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Sotomayor)
  3. Fowler v. U.S., No. 10-5443 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 668; 131 S.Ct. 2045) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Breyer)
  4. Camreta v. Greene, No. 09-1454 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 692; 131 S.Ct. 2020) (May 26, 2011) (Justice Kagan)
  5. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, No. 10-98 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 731; 131 S.Ct. 2074) (May 31, 2011) (Justice Scalia)
  6. McNeill v. U.S., No. 10-5258 (U.S. Supreme Court) (563 U.S. 816; 131 S.Ct. 2218) (June 6, 2011) (Justice Thomas)
  7. Sykes v. U.S., No. 09-11311 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 1; 131 S.Ct. 2267) (June 9, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)

More from these topics: